<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Souce : Wikipedia permits to republish here at based on restrictions Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Contents in wikipedia is frequently revised and I endeaver to put in the latest version here.
But I suggest you visit them frequently just in case.
But I suggest you visit them frequently just in case.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia | This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2008) |
 | This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. See the talk page for details. WikiProject Finance may be able to help recruit an expert. (March 2009) |
A payday loan (also called a paycheck advance) is a small, short-term loan that is intended to cover a borrower's expenses until his or her next payday. The loans are also sometimes referred to as cash advances, though that term can also refer to cash provided against a prearranged line of credit such as a credit card (see cash advance). Legislation regarding payday loans varies widely between different countries and, within the USA, between different states.
Some jurisdictions impose strict usury limits, limiting the annual percentage rate (APR) that any lender, including payday lenders, can charge; some outlaw payday lending entirely; and some have very few restrictions on payday lenders. Due to the extremely short-term nature of payday loans, the difference between nominal APR and effective APR (EAR) can be substantial, because EAR takes compounding into account. For a $15 charge on a $100 2-week payday loan, the APR is 26 × 15% = 390% but the EAR is (1.1526 − 1) × 100% = 3,685%. Careful reporting of whether EAR or APR is quoted is necessary to make meaningful comparisons.
Payday loans carry substantial risk to the lender; they have 10-20% default rate[1], and according to one study, defaults cost payday lenders around a quarter of their annual revenue.[2]
Contents[hide] |
The loan process
The basic loan process is simply that a lender provides a short-term unsecured loan to be repaid at the borrower's next pay day. Typically, some verification of employment or income is involved (via pay stubs and bank statements), but some lenders may omit this. Individual companies and franchises have their own underwriting criteria.In the traditional retail model, borrowers visit a payday lending store and secure a small cash loan, with payment due in full at the borrower's next paycheck. The borrower writes a postdated check to the lender in the full amount of the loan plus fees. On the maturity date, the borrower is expected to return to the store to repay the loan in person. If the borrower does not repay the loan in person, the lender may redeem the check. If the account is short on funds to cover the check, the borrower may now face a bounced check fee from their bank in addition to the costs of the loan, and the loan may incur additional fees and/or an increased interest rate as a result of the failure to pay.
In the more recent innovation of online payday loans, consumers complete the loan application online (or in some instances via fax, especially where documentation is required). The loan is then transferred by direct deposit to the borrower's account, and the loan repayment and/or the finance charge is electronically withdrawn on the borrower's next payday. According to some sources, many payday lenders operating on the internet do not run credit checks or verify income.[3]
Opponents Charges
 | A concern has been raised that this article's Criticism section may be compromising the article's neutral point of view of the subject. Possible resolutions may be to integrate the material in the section into the article as a whole, or to rewrite the contents of the section. Please see the discussion on the talk page. (February 2010) |
Payday lending is a controversial practice and faces both legal battles and public perception challenges in nearly every place where it is practiced.
Draining money from low-income communities
People who resort to payday lending are typically low-income people with few assets, as these are people who are least able to secure normal, lower-interest-rate forms of credit. Since the payday lending operations charge such high interest-rates, and do nothing to encourage savings or asset accumulation, they have the effect of depleting the assets of low-income communities.[4]Exploiting financial hardship for profit
Critics such as Consumers Union blame payday lenders for exploiting people's financial hardship for profit. They say lenders target the young and the poor, particularly those near military bases and in low-income communities. They also say that borrowers may not understand that the high interest rates are likely to trap them in a "debt-cycle," where they have to repeatedly renew the loan and pay associated fees every two weeks until they can finally save enough to pay off the principal and get out of debt. Critics also say that payday lending unfairly disadvantages the poor, compared to the middle class who pay at most 25% or so on their credit cards.Aggressive advertising practices
Debt charity Credit Action made a complaint to the UK Office of Fair Trading (OFT) that payday lenders were placing adverts on social network website Facebook which broke advertising regulations. Their main complaint was that the APR was either not displayed at all or not displayed prominently enough, which is clearly required by UK advertising standards. [5] [6]Aggressive collection practices
In US law, a payday lender can use only the same industry standard collection practices used to collect other debts.In many cases, the borrower has written a post-dated check to the lender; if the borrower defaults, then this check will bounce. Some payday lenders have therefore threatened delinquent borrowers with criminal prosecution, for check fraud.[7] This practice is illegal in many jurisdictions.
Ignoring legal restrictions
Payday lenders have been known to ignore usury limits and charge higher amounts than they are entitled to by law. On May 30, 2008, the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation fined Global Payday Loan $234,000—the largest fine in Illinois history against a payday lender—for exceeding the $15.50 per $100 limit on charges for payday loans.[8] A customer, known only as J.M., borrowed $300 and repaid $360 ($13.50 more than the company was legally entitled to collect under the Illinois Payday Loan Reform Act), but the company was still sending her warnings that her account was 'seriously delinquent' and that her unpaid balance was $630.Pricing structure of payday loans
Issuers of payday loans defend their higher interest rates by saying processing costs for payday loans do not differ much from other loans, including home mortgages.[citation needed] They argue that conventional interest rates for lower dollar amounts and shorter terms would not be profitable. For example, a $100 one-week loan, at a 20% APR (compounded weekly) would generate only 38 cents of interest, which would fail to match loan processing costs.Critics[who?] say payday lenders' processing costs are significantly lower than costs for mortgages and other traditional loans. Payday lenders usually look at recent pay-stubs, whereas larger-loan lenders do full credit checks and make a determination about the borrower's ability to pay back the loan.[citation needed]
Proponents' stance
Charges are in line with costs
A study by the FDIC Center for Financial Research[9] found that “operating costs are not that out of line with the size of advance fees” collected and that, after subtracting fixed operating costs and “unusually high rate of default losses,” payday loans “may not necessarily yield extraordinary profits.” Based on the annual reports of publicly traded payday loan companies, loan losses can average 15% or more of loan revenue. Underwriters of payday loans must also deal with people presenting fraudulent checks as security, ordering a check stopped, or closing their account.[citation needed]Critics concede that some borrowers may default on the loans, but point to the industry's pace of growth as an indication of its profitability. Consumer advocates condemn the practice as a whole, regardless of its profitability, because it "takes advantage of consumers who are already hard-pressed to pay their debts".[10]
According to the Dallas Morning News, in 2008 the U.S.'s largest payday lender, Advance America, "made $4.2 billion in payday loans and charged $676 million in interest and fees." And "Cash America, a pawnshop operator and payday lender based in Fort Worth, recorded net income of $81 million last year – a 132 percent increase in just four years – on total revenue of $1.03 billion."[11]
Opponents of government regulation of payday loan businesses argue that some individuals that require the use of payday loans have already exhausted or ruined any other alternatives. Such consumers could potentially be forced to turn to loan sharks or other illegal sources if not for payday loans. Tom Lehman, an advocate of unfettered payday lending, said,
- [P]ayday lending services extend small amounts of uncollateralized credit to high-risk borrowers, and provide loans to poor households when other financial institutions will not. Throughout the past decade, this "democratization of credit" has made small loans available to mass sectors of the population, and particularly the poor, that would not have had access to credit of any kind in the past....[12]
- These allegations against the payday-lending industry are largely without merit, and generally reflect the views of "do-gooder" anticapitalist elites who abhor the "messy" and unplanned outcomes in low-income consumer finance markets. Rather than seeing payday lending practices as a creative extension of credit to poor households who may otherwise be without loans, these critics see it as yet another opportunity for government intervention in the name of "helping" the poor.[12]
Household welfare increased
A staff report released by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York concluded that payday loans should not be categorized as "predatory" since they may improve household welfare.[14] "Defining and Detecting Predatory Lending" reports "if payday lenders raise household welfare by relaxing credit constraints, anti-predatory legislation may lower it." The author of the report, Donald P. Morgan, defined predatory lending as "a welfare reducing provision of credit." However, he also noted that loans are very expensive, and that they are likely to be made to under-educated households or households of uncertain income.Other studies have questioned this claim. Petru Stelian Stoianovici, a researcher from The Brattle Group, and Michael T. Maloney, an economics professor from Clemson University, found "no empirical evidence that payday lending leads to more bankruptcy filings, which casts doubt on the debt trap argument against payday lending."[15]
Payday loans around the world
Australia
Main article: Payday loans in Australia
The Australian states of New South Wales and Queensland have imposed a 48%-APR maximum loan rate, including fees and brokerage.[16][17]Canada
Main article: Payday loans in Canada
Payday loans in Canada are limited by usury laws, with any rate of interest charged above 60% per annum considered criminal according to the Criminal Code of Canada. In addition, the provinces of British Columbia and Saskatchewan have imposed specific regulations on payday loans, including lower interest rate caps.UK
Main article: Payday loans in the United Kingdom
Payday loans in the United Kingdom are a rapidly growing industry, with four times as many people using such loans in 2009 compared to 2006 - in 2009 1.2 million people took out 4.1 million loans, with total lending amounting to £1.2 billion.[18] The average loan size is around £300, and two-thirds of borrowers have annual incomes below £25,000. There are no restrictions on the interest rates payday loan companies can charge, although they are required by law to state the effective annual percentage rate (APR).[18]United States
Main article: Payday loans in the United States
Payday lending is legal and regulated in 37 states. In 13 states it is either illegal or not feasible, given state law.[19] When not explicitly banned, laws that prohibit payday lending are usually in the form of usury limits: hard interest rate caps calculated strictly by annual percentage rate (APR). Since Oct. 1, 2007 a federal law has capped lending to military personnel at a maximum of 36% APR as defined by the Secretary of Defense.[20]Variations and alternatives
Alternatives to payday loans
Other options are available to most payday loan customers.[21] These include pawnbrokers, credit union loans with lower interest and more stringent terms,[22] credit payment plans, paycheck cash advances from employers, bank overdraft protection, cash advances from credit cards, emergency community assistance plans, small consumer loans and direct loans from family or friends.Payday lenders do not compare their interest rates to those of mainstream lenders. Instead, they compare their fees to the overdraft, late payment, and penalty fees that will be incurred if the customer is unable to secure any credit whatsoever.
The lenders therefore list a different set of alternatives (costs expressed here as APRs for two-week terms):[citation needed]
- $100 payday advance with $15 fee = 391% APR;
- $100 bounced check with $48 NSF/merchant fees = 1,251% APR;
- $100 credit card balance with $26 late fee = 678% APR;
- $100 utility bill with $50 late/reconnect fees = 1,304% APR.
Variations on payday lending
A minority of mainstream banks and TxtLoan companies lending short-term credit over mobile phone text messaging offer virtual credit advances for customers whose paychecks or other funds are deposited electronically into their accounts. The terms are similar to those of a payday loan; a customer receives a predetermined cash credit available for immediate withdrawal. The amount is deducted, along with a fee, usually about 10 percent of the amount borrowed, when the next direct deposit is posted to the customer's account. After the programs attracted regulatory attention,[24][25] Wells Fargo called its fee "voluntary" and offered to waive it for any reason. It later scaled back the program in several states. Wells Fargo currently offers its version of a payday loan, called "Direct Deposit Advance," which charges 120% APR. Similarly, BBC reported in 2010 that controversial TxtLoan charges 10% for 7-days advance which is available for approved customers instantly over a text message.[26]Income tax refund anticipation loans are not technically payday loans (because they are repayable upon receipt of the borrower's income tax refund, not at his next payday), but they have similar credit and cost characteristics. A car title loan is secured by the borrower's car, but are available only to borrowers who hold clear title (i.e., no other loans) to a vehicle. The maximum amount of the loan is some fraction of the resale value of the car. A similar credit facility seen in the UK is a logbook loan secured against a car's logbook, which the lender retains.[27] These loans may be available on slightly better terms than an unsecured payday loan, since they are less risky to the lender. If the borrower defaults, then the lender can attempt to recover costs by repossessing and reselling the car.
See also
References
- ^ Megan McArdle,theatlantic.com, 18 November 2009, On Poverty, Interest Rates, and Payday Loans
- ^ Paige Skiba and Jeremy Tobacman, 10 December 2007, [1]: The Profitability of Payday Loans
- ^ Bachelor, Lisa (2008-05-29). "You can settle the loan on payday - but the APR could be more than 2,000 per cent". The Guardian (London).
- ^ HaworthPress.com: Howard Jacob Karger, "Scamming the Poor: The Modern Fringe Economy", The Social Policy Journal, pp. 39-54, 2004.
- ^ "Facebook users warned about ads". BBC News. 2008-05-12. Retrieved 2008-06-10.
- ^ Credit Action Campaigns on Facebook Debt Ads
- ^ Fast Cash Loans Charged by State Regulator
- ^ "Internet Payday Lender Fined More Than $230,000 for Unlicensed Lending In Illinois". Press release. Illinois. 2008-05-30. Retrieved 2008-06-11.
- ^ Mark Flannery; Katherine Samolyk (2005-06). "Payday Lending: Do the Costs Justify the Price?". Retrieved 2010-10-03.
- ^ U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services Democratic Office
- ^ Dallasnews.com
- ^ a b Lehman, Tom. "In Defense of Payday Lending." The Free Market. Mises Institute. Volume 23, Number 9. September 2003. Mises.org
- ^ This Opinion Brought To You By... Business Week, January 30, 2006
- ^ "Defining and Detecting Predatory Lending", Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, Number 273, January 2007
- ^ Stoianovici, Petru Stelian; Maloney, Michael T. (28 October 2008). Restrictions on Credit: A Public Policy Analysis of Payday Lending. SSRN. Retrieved 10 August 2009.
- ^ Interest rate cap, QLD
- ^ Annual percentage rates, NSW
- ^ a b Marie Burton, Consumer Focus, Keeping the plates spinning: Perceptions of payday loans in Great Britain
- ^ "Payday lenders hope to return in Georgia, 3/18/07". Retrieved 2010-10-03.
- ^ The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act - Talent Amendment
- ^ Times Dispatch: Other Options Exist[dead link]
- ^ "Breaking the cycle of payday loan 'trap'", USA Today, September 19, 2006
- ^ Asset Recovery Kit (ARK) program
- ^ "New FDIC guidelines allow payday lenders to ignore state laws"
- ^ "Wells Fargo puts hold on direct deposit advance", bizjournal.com, June 2, 1997
- ^ "The cost of convenience". BBC News. 2009-12-11.
- ^ "Decision of the Trade Mark Registry over "Log Book Loans"" (PDF). UK Intellectual Property Office. 2003-11-26. pp. page 2.
External links
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Categories: Finance articles needing expert attention | Debt | Retail financial services | Personal finance | Credit | Loans
